mercredi 17 août 2022

Russian Spacewalk Ends Early After Battery Power Issue

 







EVA - Extra Vehicular Activities patch.


August 17, 2022

Expedition 67 Commander Oleg Artemyev and Flight Engineer Denis Matveev, both of Roscosmos, began a spacewalk at 9:53 a.m. EDT to continue outfitting the European robotic arm on the International Space Station’s Nauka laboratory by opening the hatch of the Poisk docking compartment airlock.

The duo is installing cameras on the European robotic arm, relocating an external control panel for the arm from one operating area to another, removing launch restraints near the two end effectors or “hands” of the arm, and testing a rigidizing mechanism on the arm that will be used to facilitate the grasping of payloads.


Image above: Flight Engineer Denis Matveev makes his way back inside the station after being instructed by Russian flight controllers to end the Aug. 17 spacewalk at the International Space Station due to a battery power issue on Artemyev’s Orlan spacesuit. Image Credit: NASA TV.

Artemyev is wearing a Russian spacesuit with red stripes, while Matveev is wearing a Russian suit with blue stripes. This will be the seventh spacewalk in Artemyev’s career, and the third for Matveev. It will be the seventh spacewalk at the station in 2022 and the 252nd spacewalk for space station assembly, maintenance, and upgrades.

Expedition 67 Commander Oleg Artemyev and Flight Engineer Denis Matveev, both of Roscosmos, were instructed by Russian flight controllers to end the Aug. 17 spacewalk at the International Space Station due to a battery power issue on Artemyev’s Orlan spacesuit.

During the spacewalk, the two cosmonauts completed the installation of two cameras on the European robotic arm prior to Artemyev’s Orlan spacesuit showing abnormal battery readings. Mission Control-Moscow instructed Artemyev to return to the Poisk airlock to connect to the space station’s power supply. Cosmonaut Sergey Korsakov, inside the station, is placing the European robotic arm in a safe configuration, and Matveev has just returned to the Poisk airlock. The duo was never in any danger during the operations.

Spacewalk Concludes After Abnormal Battery Readings

Expedition 67 Commander Oleg Artemyev and Flight Engineer Denis Matveev, both of Roscosmos, concluded their spacewalk at 1:54 p.m. EDT after 4 hours and 1 minute.


Image above: Spacewalkers Oleg Artemyev and Denis Matveev are pictured during a spacewalk on April 28, 2022, monitoring the station’s new European robotic arm. Image Credit: NASA TV.

During the spacewalk, the two cosmonauts completed the installation of two cameras on the European robotic arm prior to Artemyev’s Orlan spacesuit showing abnormal battery readings about 2 hours and 17 minutes into the extravehicular activity. Mission Control-Moscow instructed Artemeyev to return to the Poisk airlock to connect to the space station’s power supply. Cosmonaut Sergey Korsakov, inside the station, placed the European robotic arm in a safe configuration, and Matveev safely returned to the Poisk airlock after completing some final clean-up activities outside of the International Space Station. The duo was never in any danger during the operations.

Additional spacewalks are planned to continue outfitting the European robotic arm and to activate Nauka’s airlock for future spacewalks. The work on the European robotic arm will be used to move spacewalkers and payloads around the Russian segment of the station.

This was the seventh spacewalk in Artemyev’s career, and the third for Matveev. It was the seventh spacewalk at the station in 2022 and the 252nd spacewalk for space station assembly, maintenance, and upgrades.

Related links:

Poisk module: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/structure/elements/poisk-mini-research-module-2

Nauka multipurpose laboratory module: https://www.roscosmos.ru/tag/nauka/

International Space Station (ISS): https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/main/index.html

Images (mentioned), Text, Credits: NASA/Mark Garcia.

Best regards, Orbiter.ch

Artemis I Moon Rocket Arrives at Launch Pad Ahead of Historic Mission

 







NASA - ARTEMIS-1 Mission patch.


Aug 17, 2022


Image above: NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS) rocket with the Orion spacecraft aboard is seen atop a mobile launcher at Launch Pad 39B, Wednesday, Aug. 17, 2022, after being rolled out to the launch pad at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida. NASA’s Artemis I mission is the first integrated test of the agency’s deep space exploration systems: the Orion spacecraft, SLS rocket, and supporting ground systems. Launch of the uncrewed flight test is targeted for no earlier than Aug. 29. Photo Credits: NASA/Joel Kowsky.

Around 7:30 a.m. EDT the Space Launch System rocket and Orion spacecraft for the Artemis I mission arrived atop Launch Complex 39B at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida after a nearly 10-hour journey from the Vehicle Assembly Building.

In the coming days, engineers and technicians will configure systems at the pad for launch, which is currently targeted for no earlier than Aug. 29 at 8:33 a.m. (two hour launch window). Teams have worked to refine operations and procedures and have incorporated lessons learned from the wet dress rehearsal test campaign and have updated the launch timeline accordingly.

Related articles:

Artemis I Moon Rocket Ready to Roll to the Launch Pad
https://orbiterchspacenews.blogspot.com/2022/08/artemis-i-moon-rocket-ready-to-roll-to.html

Progress Continues Toward Artemis I Launch
https://orbiterchspacenews.blogspot.com/2022/07/progress-continues-toward-artemis-i.html

NASA’s Moon Rocket and Spacecraft Arrive at Vehicle Assembly Building
https://orbiterchspacenews.blogspot.com/2022/07/nasas-moon-rocket-and-spacecraft-arrive.html

Artemis I Rollback to VAB Rescheduled for July 1 (July 2 for Europa)
https://orbiterchspacenews.blogspot.com/2022/07/artemis-i-rollback-to-vab-rescheduled.html

Teams on Track for Artemis I Wet Dress Rehearsal Test
https://orbiterchspacenews.blogspot.com/2022/06/teams-on-track-for-artemis-i-wet-dress.html

Artemis I Moon Rocket Heads Back to Launch Pad for Testing
https://orbiterchspacenews.blogspot.com/2022/06/artemis-i-moon-rocket-heads-back-to.html

Artemis I Moon Rocket to Return to Launch Pad 39B in Early June
https://orbiterchspacenews.blogspot.com/2022/05/artemis-i-moon-rocket-to-return-to.html

Artemis I Mission Availability
https://orbiterchspacenews.blogspot.com/2022/05/artemis-i-mission-availability.html

Work Continues to Return Artemis I Moon Rocket Back to Launch Pad for Next Test
https://orbiterchspacenews.blogspot.com/2022/05/work-continues-to-return-artemis-i-moon.html

NASA’s Artemis I Moon Rocket to Depart Launch Pad 39B Today
https://orbiterchspacenews.blogspot.com/2022/04/nasas-artemis-i-moon-rocket-to-depart.html

Artemis I WDR Update: Teams Working Solution to Continue Propellant Loading Operations
https://orbiterchspacenews.blogspot.com/2022/04/artemis-i-wdr-update-teams-working.html

Artemis I Update: Countdown is Underway for Wet Dress Rehearsal
https://orbiterchspacenews.blogspot.com/2022/04/artemis-i-update-countdown-is-underway.html

NASA Prepares for Next Artemis I Wet Dress Rehearsal Attempt
https://orbiterchspacenews.blogspot.com/2022/04/nasa-prepares-for-next-artemis-i-wet.html

Artemis I WDR Update: Go to Proceed for Tanking – Countdown Resumes
https://orbiterchspacenews.blogspot.com/2022/04/artemis-i-wdr-update-go-to-proceed-for.html

NASA ‘Go’ for Artemis I Wet Dress Rehearsal
https://orbiterchspacenews.blogspot.com/2022/03/nasa-go-for-artemis-i-wet-dress.html

Standing tall: Moon rocket milestone for Artemis
https://orbiterchspacenews.blogspot.com/2022/03/standing-tall-moon-rocket-milestone-for.html

NASA Readies Rocket for Artemis I Wet Dress Rehearsal
https://orbiterchspacenews.blogspot.com/2022/03/nasa-readies-rocket-for-artemis-i-wet.html

Related link:

Artemis I: http://www.nasa.gov/artemis-1

Space Launch System (SLS): https://www.nasa.gov/exploration/systems/sls/index.html

Orion spacecraft: https://www.nasa.gov/exploration/systems/orion/index.html

Image (mentioned), Text, Credits: NASA/Tiffany Fairley.

Greetings, Orbiter.ch

NASA Scientists Study How to Remove Planetary 'Photobombers'

 







NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center logo.


Aug 17, 2022

Imagine you go to a theme park with your family and you ask a park employee to take a group photo. A celebrity walks by in the background and waves at the camera, stealing the focus of the photo. Surprisingly, this concept of “photobombing” is relevant to astronomers looking for habitable planets, too.

When scientists point a telescope at an exoplanet, the light the telescope receives could effectively be “contaminated” by light from other planets in the same star system, according to a new NASA study. The research, published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters on Aug. 11, modeled how this “photobombing” effect would impact an advanced space telescope designed to observe potentially habitable exoplanets and suggested potential ways to overcome this challenge.

“If you looked at Earth sitting next to Mars or Venus from a distant vantage point, then depending on when you observed them, you might think they’re both the same object,” explains Dr. Prabal Saxena, a scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, who led the research.


Image above: This is a cartoon illustrating the planetary photobombing concept. Photobombers like Mars and the Moon could sneak into a picture of Earth, if you tried to observe it in a way similar to how scientists will try to find and understand potentially habitable worlds outside our solar system. Image Credits: NASA/Jay Friedlander/Prabal Saxena.

Saxena uses our own solar system as an analog to explain this photobombing effect.

“For example, depending on the observation, an exo-Earth could be hiding in [light from] what we mistakenly believe is a large exo-Venus,” said Dr. Saxena. Earth’s neighbor Venus is generally thought to be hostile to habitability, with surface temperatures hot enough to melt lead – so this mixing could lead scientists to miss out on a potentially habitable planet.

Astronomers use telescopes to analyze light from distant worlds to gather information that may reveal whether they could support life. One light-year, the distance light travels in a year, is almost six trillion miles (over nine trillion kilometers), and there are about 30 stars similar to our Sun within roughly 30 light-years of our solar system.

This photobombing phenomenon, in which observations of one planet are contaminated by light from other planets in a system, stems from the “point-spread function” (PSF) of the target planet. The PSF is an image created due to diffraction of light (the bending or spreading of light waves around an opening) coming from a source and is larger than the source for something very far away (such as an exoplanet). The size of the PSF of an object depends on the size of the telescope aperture (the light-collecting area) and wavelength at which the observation is taken. For worlds around a distant star, a PSF may resolve in such a way that two nearby planets or a planet and a moon could seem to morph into one.


Image above: Artist’s concept of Kepler-186f, an Earth-size exoplanet orbiting a red dwarf star in the constellation Cygnus. Image Credits: NASA/Tim Pyle.

If that is the case, the data that scientists can gather about such an Earth analog would be skewed or affected by whatever world or worlds were photobombing the planet in question, which could complicate or outright prevent the detection and confirmation of an exo-Earth, a potential planet like Earth beyond our solar system.

Saxena examined an analogous scenario in which otherworldly astronomers might be looking at Earth from more than 30 light-years away, using a telescope similar to that recommended in the 2020 Astrophysics Decadal Survey. “We found that such a telescope would sometimes see potential exo-Earths beyond 30 light-years distance blended with additional planets in their systems, including those that are outside of the habitable zone, for a range of different wavelengths of interest,” Saxena said.

The habitable zone is that region of space around a star where the amount of starlight would allow liquid water on a planet’s surface, which may enable the existence of life.

There are multiple strategies to deal with the photobombing problem. These include developing new methods of processing data gathered by telescopes to mitigate the potential that photobombing will skew the results of a study. Another method would be to study systems over time, to avoid the possibility that planets with close orbits would appear in each other’s PSFs. Saxena’s study also discusses how using observations from multiple telescopes or increasing the size of the telescope could reduce the photobombing effect at similar distances.

Discovering exoplanets and determining if any can support life is part of NASA’s mission to explore and understand the unknown, to inspire and benefit humanity.

The research was funded by NASA under award number 80GSFC21M0002 and was also funded in part by the Goddard Sellers Exoplanet Environments Collaboration (SEEC).

Related links:

Exoplanets: https://www.nasa.gov/content/the-search-for-life

Astrophysical Journal Letters: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/ac7b93/meta

Images (mentioned), Text, Credits: NASA/Bill Steigerwald/GSFC/By Nick Oakes.

Best regards, Orbiter.ch

Voyager, NASA’s Longest-Lived Mission, Logs 45 Years in Space

 






NASA - Voyager 1 & 2 Mission patch.


Aug. 17, 2022

Launched in 1977, the twin Voyager probes are NASA’s longest-operating mission and the only spacecraft ever to explore interstellar space.


Image above: This archival image taken at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory on March 23, 1977, shows engineers preparing the Voyager 2 spacecraft ahead of its launch later that year. Image Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech.

NASA’s twin Voyager probes have become, in some ways, time capsules of their era: They each carry an eight-track tape player for recording data, they have about 3 million times less memory than modern cellphones, and they transmit data about 38,000 times slower than a 5G internet connection.


Image above: 45 Years of Voyager I and II. Launched in 1977, NASA’s twin Voyager spacecraft inspired the world with pioneering visits to Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. Their journey continues 45 years later as both probes explore interstellar space, the region outside the protective heliosphere created by our Sun. Image Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech.

Yet the Voyagers remain on the cutting edge of space exploration. Managed and operated by NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California, they are the only probes to ever explore interstellar space – the galactic ocean that our Sun and its planets travel through.


Image above: This archival photo shows engineers working on vibration acoustics and pyro shock testing of NASA’s Voyager on Nov. 18, 1976. Image Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech.

The Sun and the planets reside in the heliosphere, a protective bubble created by the Sun’s magnetic field and the outward flow of solar wind (charged particles from the Sun). Researchers – some of them younger than the two distant spacecraft – are combining Voyager’s observations with data from newer missions to get a more complete picture of our Sun and how the heliosphere interacts with interstellar space.


Image above: This image highlights the special cargo onboard NASA's Voyager spacecraft: the Golden Record. Each of the two Voyager spacecraft launched in 1977 carry a 12-inch gold-plated phonograph record with images and sounds from Earth. Image Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech.

“The heliophysics mission fleet provides invaluable insights into our Sun, from understanding the corona or the outermost part of the Sun’s atmosphere, to examining the Sun’s impacts throughout the solar system, including here on Earth, in our atmosphere, and on into interstellar space,” said Nicola Fox, director of the Heliophysics Division at NASA Headquarters in Washington. “Over the last 45 years, the Voyager missions have been integral in providing this knowledge and have helped change our understanding of the Sun and its influence in ways no other spacecraft can.”


Image above: This processed color image of Jupiter was produced in 1990 by the U.S. Geological Survey from a Voyager image captured in 1979. Zones of light-colored, ascending clouds alternate with bands of dark, descending clouds. Image Credits: NASA/JPL/USGS.

The Voyagers are also ambassadors, each carrying a golden record containing images of life on Earth, diagrams of basic scientific principles, and audio that includes sounds from nature, greetings in multiple languages, and music. The gold-coated records serve as a cosmic “message in a bottle” for anyone who might encounter the space probes. At the rate gold decays in space and is eroded by cosmic radiation, the records will last more than a billion years.


Image above: This photo of Jupiter was taken by NASA's Voyager 1 on the evening of March 1, 1979, from a distance of 2.7 million miles (4.3 million kilometers). The photo shows Jupiter's Great Red Spot (top) and one of the white ovals. Image Credits: NASA/JPL.

Beyond Expectations

Voyager 2 launched on Aug. 20, 1977, quickly followed by Voyager 1 on Sept. 5. Both probes traveled to Jupiter and Saturn, with Voyager 1 moving faster and reaching them first. Together, the probes unveiled much about the solar system’s two largest planets and their moons. Voyager 2 also became the first and only spacecraft to fly close to Uranus (in 1986) and Neptune (in 1989), offering humanity remarkable views of – and insights into – these distant worlds.


Image above: NASA’s Voyager 1 acquired this image of a volcanic explosion on Io on March 4, 1979, about 11 hours before the spacecraft’s closest approach to the moon of Jupiter. Image Credits: NASA/JPL.

While Voyager 2 was conducting these flybys, Voyager 1 headed toward the boundary of the heliosphere. Upon exiting it in 2012, Voyager 1 discovered that the heliosphere blocks 70% of cosmic rays, or energetic particles created by exploding stars. Voyager 2, after completing its planetary explorations, continued to the heliosphere boundary, exiting in 2018. The twin spacecraft’s combined data from this region has challenged previous theories about the exact shape of the heliosphere.


Image above: Voyager 1 and 2 have accomplished a lot since they launched in 1977. This infographic highlights the mission’s major milestones, including visiting the four outer planets and exiting the heliosphere, or the protective bubble of magnetic fields and particles created by the Sun. Image Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech.

“Today, as both Voyagers explore interstellar space, they are providing humanity with observations of uncharted territory,” said Linda Spilker, Voyager’s deputy project scientist at JPL. “This is the first time we’ve been able to directly study how a star, our Sun, interacts with the particles and magnetic fields outside our heliosphere, helping scientists understand the local neighborhood between the stars, upending some of the theories about this region, and providing key information for future missions.”


Image above: This approximate natural-color image from NASA's Voyager 2 shows Saturn, its rings, and four of its icy satellites. Three satellites Tethys, Dione, and Rhea are visible against the darkness of space. Image Credits: NASA/JPL/USGS.


Image above: Neptune’s green-blue atmosphere was shown in greater detail than ever before in this image from NASA’s Voyager 2 as the spacecraft rapidly approached its encounter with the giant planet in August 1989. Image Credits: NASA/JPL.

The Long Journey

Over the years, the Voyager team has grown accustomed to surmounting challenges that come with operating such mature spacecraft, sometimes calling upon retired colleagues for their expertise or digging through documents written decades ago.

Voyager 2 Launch

Video above: Voyager 2 launched on Aug. 20, 1977, quickly followed by Voyager 1 on Sept. 5. Both probes traveled to Jupiter and Saturn, with Voyager 1 moving faster and reaching them first. Together, the probes unveiled much about the solar system’s two largest planets and their moons. Voyager 2 also became the first and only spacecraft to fly close to Uranus (in 1986) and Neptune (in 1989), offering humanity remarkable views of – and insights into – these distant worlds. Video Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech.


Image above: This image, taken by NASA's Voyager 2 early in the morning of Aug. 23, 1989, is a false color image of Triton, Neptune's largest satellite; mottling in the bright southern hemisphere is present. Image Credits: NASA/JPL.


Image above: This updated version of the iconic "Pale Blue Dot" image taken by the Voyager 1 spacecraft uses modern image-processing software and techniques to revisit the well-known Voyager view while attempting to respect the original data and intent of those who planned the images. Image Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech.

Each Voyager is powered by a radioisotope thermoelectric generator containing plutonium, which gives off heat that is converted to electricity. As the plutonium decays, the heat output decreases and the Voyagers lose electricity. To compensate, the team turned off all nonessential systems and some once considered essential, including heaters that protect the still-operating instruments from the frigid temperatures of space. All five of the instruments that have had their heaters turned off since 2019 are still working, despite being well below the lowest temperatures they were ever tested at.


Image above: This illustrated graphic was made to mark Voyager 1’s entry into interstellar space in 2012. It puts solar system distances in perspective, with the scale bar in astronomical units and each set distance beyond 1 AU (the average distance between the Sun and Earth) representing 10 times the previous distance. Image Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech.

Recently, Voyager 1 began experiencing an issue that caused status information about one of its onboard systems to become garbled. Despite this, the system and spacecraft otherwise continue to operate normally, suggesting the problem is with the production of the status data, not the system itself. The probe is still sending back science observations while the engineering team tries to fix the problem or find a way to work around it.


Image above: This graphic provides some of the mission’s key statistics from 2018, when NASA’s Voyager 2 probe exited the heliosphere. Image Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech.

“The Voyagers have continued to make amazing discoveries, inspiring a new generation of scientists and engineers,” said Suzanne Dodd, project manager for Voyager at JPL. “We don’t know how long the mission will continue, but we can be sure that the spacecraft will provide even more scientific surprises as they travel farther away from the Earth.”

More About the Mission

A division of Caltech in Pasadena, JPL built and operates the Voyager spacecraft. The Voyager missions are a part of the NASA Heliophysics System Observatory, sponsored by the Heliophysics Division of the Science Mission Directorate in Washington.

For more information about the Voyager spacecraft, visit: https://www.nasa.gov/voyager

Voyager 1: https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/missions/voyager-1/in-depth/

Voyager 2: https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/missions/voyager-2/in-depth/

Images (mentioned), Video (mentioned), Text, Credits: NASA/JPL/Calla Cofield.

Greetings, Orbiter.ch

Notorious dark-matter signal could be due to analysis error

 







Astrophysics logo.


Aug 16, 2022

Observations that physicists have so far failed to replicate could be the result of misinterpreted data.


Image above: To catch dark matter, modules containing sodium-iodide crystals sit inside the COSINE-100 detector in South Korea. The experiment started running in 2016. Image Credit: COSINE-100 collaboration.

Physicists have shown that an underground experiment in South Korea can ‘see’ dark matter streaming through Earth — or not, depending on how its data are sliced. The results cast further doubt on a decades-old claim that another experiment has been detecting the mysterious substance.

The latest study, published on the arXiv preprint server on 10 August (1), reports that a certain type of data analysis by the COSINE-100 detector can produce seasonal fluctuations in the results. Physicists had proposed a similar fluctuation as a signature of dark matter, the invisible but pervasive stuff thought to be five times more abundant in the Universe than ordinary matter.

“If you apply the wrong method, you can see a fluctuation in their data where there wasn’t one,” says Nicola Rossi, an experimental particle physicist at the Gran Sasso National Laboratory near L’Aquila, Italy, who first suggested this explanation in 2020 (2).

Dark-matter signal

For more than two decades, the experiment now known as DAMA/LIBRA, which is also at the Gran Sasso National Laboratory, has been reporting yearly fluctuations in flashes registered by the sodium iodide crystals of its detector (3). The number of these events peak in June and bottom out in December, just as physicists would expect if particles of dark matter are suffusing the Milky Way. That’s because, as Earth orbits the Sun, its velocity in the Galaxy peaks in June, so that more particles from the dark-matter halo would hit the DAMA/LIBRA detector at that time — just as greater numbers of flying insects hit a car’s windscreen when the car moves faster.

But none of the many other dark-matter experiments — based on various other technologies — has so far seen signals compatible with DAMA/LIBRA’s. So, to put the claim to the ultimate test, in the mid-2010s, physicists began to build detectors made of the same type of sodium iodide crystal. Preliminary results from two of these experiments, COSINE-100 Yangyang underground laboratory in South Korea and ANAIS-112 at the Canfranc Underground Laboratory in the Spanish Pyrenees, failed to reproduce the windscreen effect.

Even though most of the physics community had discounted the DAMA/LIBRA results as probably spurious, the question of why the Italian experiment was seeing a periodic up-and-down in its recorded events remained. Over the years, the collaboration has convincingly rebuffed a number of proposed explanations.

Changing background

In 2020, while reading papers by the DAMA/LIBRA collaboration, Rossi and his colleagues noticed that the fluctuations reported were only those that occurred over a supposed ‘background’ of events that the team discounted as experimental artefacts, such as sources of radioactivity in the laboratory or in the detector itself.

But unless the background was absolutely constant throughout the year, this could be “a dangerous approach”, Rossi and his co-authors wrote. The windscreen effect should add a sinusoidal term to the background. But the precise way in which a background is modelled and subtracted could affect how the data are interpreted, and potentially create a spurious dark-matter signal.

To subtract the background flashes, the DAMA/LIBRA team averaged them out over every year, which could have made the number of remaining events look like a sawtooth wave. And because real-life data points are noisy, it could be easy, Rossi and his colleagues wrote in their 2020 report, to confuse the fluctuations with the type of sine wave expected from dark matter. The researchers also used simulated data to show that they could create a fake dark-matter signal if the number of background flashes was slowly increasing over time.

Result recreated

The COSINE-100 collaboration has now carried out a similar analysis of the real-world data collected by its crystals. “We can generate a DAMA-like signal with our analysis, but our timing is the opposite direction,” says Hyun Su Lee, a physicist at the Institute for Basic Science in Daejeon, South Korea, who is a co-leader of COSINE-100. In other words, as the backgrounds at the South Korea-based experiment naturally abate, its ‘dark matter’ count is highest around early December and lowest around early June.

This leaves a dilemma. Dark-matter detectors and other physics experiments must often contend with impurities in their radioactive materials, but as these age and the radioactive isotopes decay away, the background tends to become quieter, not louder. “Increasing background is pretty unnatural,” says Lee. Still, Rossi and his team suggest that some effects, such as radioactive impurities slowly creeping into the detector from outside, could, in principle, cause an increasing-background effect.

Either way, that the data analysis created a spurious fluctuation “strikes me as a potentially good — and maybe even likely — explanation” for the DAMA/LIBRA claims, says Dan Hooper, a specialist in dark-matter theory at the University of Chicago in Illinois.

Because the DAMA/LIBRA detector was built decades ago and has been kept underground ever since, radioactive backgrounds are more stable than in recently-built experiments, says Rita Bernabei, a physicist at the Tor Vergata University of Rome and spokesperson for DAMA/LIBRA. “If any small hypothetical contribution from a decreasing rate were there, it might decrease the observed modulation amplitude, but it would never produce positive signal as we observe,” she adds. The collaboration has also rebuked Rossi's group's arguments in a paper (4) that calls their assumptions “untenable” and their conclusions “worthless”.

The physics community has repeatedly called on the DAMA/LIBRA team to reveal more of its data and, in particular, to provide the total counts of flashes. Bernabei says this “does not add any useful information.” But the added transparency could work to the collaboration’s advantage, says Rossi: if the full background count does turn out to be constant in time, it would add credibility to the team’s claim of seeing a sinusoidal fluctuation. “If the DAMA collaboration had been more open, this could have been figured out a long time ago,” says Hooper.

Meanwhile, attempts to replicate the dark-matter detections press on. Earlier this month, ANAIS-112 completed five years of data collection and is working on an analysis, says spokesperson Maria Luisa Sarsa of the University of Zaragoza in Spain. The data are sensitive enough that they could potentially exclude the DAMA/LIBRA result with a high statistical confidence. In a few years, that confidence could rise to five standard deviations, which is commonly the threshold for a physics result to be considered solid.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-02222-9

References:

1. Adhikari, G. et al. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.05158 (2022).

2. Buttazzo, D., Panci, P., Rossi, N. & Strumia, A. J. High Energy Phys. 2020, 137 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007%2FJHEP04%282020%29137

3. Bernabei, R. et al. Nucl. Phys. At. Energy 22, 329–342 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.15407%2Fjnpae2021.04.329

4. Bernabei, R., et al. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 114, 103810 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.ppnp.2020.103810

Related link:

DAMA/LIBRA: https://www.lngs.infn.it/en/dama

Image (mentioned), Text, Credits: Nature/Davide Castelvecchi.

Best regards, Orbiter.ch

China's X-ray observatory detects strongest magnetic field ever recorded

 




CNSA - HMXT-Insight telescope logo.


Aug 17, 2022

China's Insight-HXMT telescope breaks its own record with new detection.


Image above:  An illustration of China's HMXT-Insight telescope, which has detected the strongest-ever magnetic field recorded so far. Image credit: CASC.

A Chinese X-ray telescope has detected the strongest-ever magnetic field recorded by making observations of a rapidly-spinning neutron star, or magnetar.

Insight, also known as the Hard X-ray Modulation Telescope (HMXT), launched in 2017 and is able to observe a broad range of x-ray energy photons.

A team of researchers now report findings from observations of the x-ray spectrum of magnetar J0243.6+6124, indicating a magnetic field of more than 1.6 billion Tesla, nearly double the previous record reading for a magnetar.

Relate article:

China successfully launches Hard X-ray Modulation Telescope
https://orbiterchspacenews.blogspot.com/2017/06/china-successfully-launches-hard-x-ray.html

Related links:

Insight-HXMT telescope: http://hxmten.ihep.ac.cn/

China National Space Administration (CNSA): http://www.cnsa.gov.cn/english/index.html

Images (mentioned), Text, Credits: CNSA/Space.com/By Andrew Jones.

Best regards, Orbiter.ch

Asteroid Ryugu is a drifter from the outer Solar System

 







JAXA - Hayabusa2 Mission patch.


Aug 17, 2022

Asteroid Ryugu is a drifter from the outer Solar System:

Results from the Hayabusa2 Phase-2 Curation Kochi Team published in Nature Astronomy

The Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) has just completed the first year of its analytical campaign on samples returned from asteroid Ryugu. These cutting-edge studies have been undertaken by two Phase-2 curation teams (the Kochi Institute for Core Sample Research, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, JAMSTEC and Okayama University) and six sub-teams of the Initial Analysis Team.

We are pleased to announce that a journal article summarizing the results of the Phase-2 Kochi Team has been published in “Nature Astronomy” on August 16, 2022 (JST).

Title:

A pristine record of outer Solar System materials from asteroid Ryugu's returned sample

Initial analysis of the asteroid Ryugu sample

The sample from asteroid Ryugu returned to Earth by the asteroid explorer, Hayabusa2, on December 6, 2020, initially underwent a cataloguing description (Phase-1 curation) at the facility established at JAXA’s Institute of Space and Astronautical Science. Part of the returned sample was distributed to the Hayabusa2 Initial Analysis Team, consisting of six sub-teams, and two Phase-2 curation institutes at Okayama University and JAMSTEC Kochi Institute for Core Sample Research. The initial analysis is designed to reveal the multifaceted features of the sample through a plan of high-precision analysis, with specialized sub-teams assigned to tackle the science objectives of the Hayabusa2 mission. Meanwhile, the Phase-2 curation institutes have specific specialties that are utilized to catalogue the sample based on a comprehensive analysis flow, and clarify the potential impact of the sample through measurement and analysis appropriate to the characteristics of the returned particles.

Hayabusa2 orbiting asteroid Ryugu. Image Credit: JAXA

Reports from the six teams involved in the initial analysis, as well as those from Okayama University and JAMSTEC Kochi Institute for Core Sample Research, will be announced separately as the results are published in scientific journals. After the initial results have been released, a new overall summary of the Hayabusa2 science is planned.

Asteroid Ryugu: A drifter from the outer Solar System region

- Geochemistry and isotopic evidence from organic and phyllosilicate-rich material

1. Overview

The Phase-2 curation [*1] Kochi Team, led by Motoo Ito of the Extra-cutting-edge Science and Technology Avant-garde Research (X-star), Kochi Institute for Core Sample Research, JAMSTEC, began analysis of Ryugu particles on June 20, 2021. The results of the first-year analytical campaign, based on systematic investigations conducted at institutes and universities across Japan, the USA, and the UK, has been published in Nature Astronomy on August 15, 2022 (August 16, JST).

2. Key points

1. The mineralogy of the Ryugu particles indicate that they underwent extensive aqueous alteration.

2. The deuterium-rich and 15N-rich isotopic compositions of fine-grained minerals and organics suggest that the constituents of the Ryugu particles formed in the outer Solar System.

3. Aliphatic carbon-rich organics associated with coarse-grained phyllosilicates were found. Such an association has not been observed in any meteorite study and could be unique to the asteroid Ryugu.

4. The results suggest that coarse-grained phyllosilicates may have served as “cradles” for organics and water, which may subsequently have been transported to the early Earth.

3. Background

Earth's materials have experienced continuous modification due to geological processes that have operated throughout its history; as a result, much of the information about its primordial composition has been lost. Primitive asteroids preserve the earliest evidence of how and when our Solar System formed. Fragments from these asteroids are delivered to Earth as meteorites and space scientists have long been studying these materials to decipher the 4.6-billion-years-history of our Solar System. However, there is a problem. During atmospheric entry the chemical composition of meteorites is altered by interaction with the Earth’s atmosphere. Any delays in collecting the samples results in further changes, generally referred to as terrestrial weathering. By collecting samples directly from asteroid Ryugu and delivering them to Earth free from terrestrial contamination, the JAXA Hayabusa2 mission has provided scientists with the opportunity to study contamination-free, primitive samples for the very first time. Therefore, we are able to obtain the freshest chemical characteristics to elucidate the formation history of the early Solar System and the origins of water and the evolution of organics that likely were the building blocks for life on Earth.

Asteroid Ryugu animation. Animation Credit: JAXA

The Hayabusa2 spacecraft was launched by JAXA on December 3, 2014, and arrived at asteroid Ryugu to perform close-proximity spectroscopic observations; samples were successfully collected twice from different locations. The capsule containing samples was recovered on December 6, 2020, in the Woomera Desert, South Australia. A total of approximately 5.4 grams of dark black particles were identified in the capsule. Researchers at the Extraterrestrial Sample Curation Center (ESCuC) of JAXA performed the initial description of these particles, the results of which were published in November of 2021 (Yada et al., 2021; Pilorget et al., 2021). Two Phase-2 curation teams and the six Initial Analysis sub-teams began work on the Hayabusa2 samples in June 2021. Beginning in June of 2022, their initial results have started to be published in international, high-impact, scientific journals.

4. Outcome

The Phase-2 curation Kochi Team has been working with JAXA curation since 2015 to improve sample storage and transportation, analytical techniques of extraterrestrial materials, and curatorial activities. In mid-June of 2021, eight Ryugu particles (four from chamber A, four from chamber C; particles have a diameter of 1–4 mm), approximately 50 mg in total, were allocated to the Kochi Team. The X-ray computed tomography (CT) imaging was performed at the SPring-8 synchrotron radiation facility to assess the three-dimensional shapes and internal structures of individual particles and to determine the regions-of-interests for subsequent analyses. The particles were then transported to domestic and international research institutes without exposure to the Earth’s atmosphere. With the cooperation of the British Embassy in Japan, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, and the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Japan, the samples were safely and quickly transported to the Open University, UK and the Department of Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), USA.
 The bulk elemental abundances and the oxygen isotopic composition of the particles analyzed by the Kochi team are consistent with those reported by Yokoyama et al. (2022, Science) and E. Nakamura et al. (2022, Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Ser. B, Physical and Biological Sciences). We have concluded that asteroid Ryugu is composed of material that is representative of the average elemental abundances of our Solar System. Mineral assemblages in the Ryugu particles are consistent with having formed in the presence of water (Figure 1.), suggesting that ice (water) existed on/within the Ryugu parent body in the past and that the minerals formed as a result of the reaction between water (liquid) and the original minerals.


Image above: Figure 1. Petrography of Ryugu particles. (Top left) Largest allocated Ryugu particle (A0002); (bottom left) synchrotron X-ray based CT image of A0002 obtained at the SPring-8 facility; (middle) False-color X-ray elemental image. Mineral assemblages formed in the presence of water, red: phyllosilicates, green: carbonates, blue: magnetite, yellow: sulfides; (right) High resolution back-scattered electron image. Area enlarged from the white box in the middle panel. Image: Modified from Ito et al. (2022).

Analyses of ultra-thin sections from the Ryugu particles utilizing a nanoscale secondary ion mass spectrometer (NanoSIMS, *2) revealed that the hydrogen and nitrogen isotopic compositions are enriched in the heavier isotopes compared to that on Earth and in meteorites (Figure 2). The distributions of isotopic compositions of Ryugu show some similarities to those of interplanetary dust particles. The material from which asteroid Ryugu formed originated in the outer Solar System, and while it experienced significant aqueous alteration on its parent asteroid, it has never been significantly heated and so retains its primitive characteristics.


Image above: Figure 2. Nitrogen and hydrogen isotopic composition of Ryugu particles compared to various extraterrestrial materials. This data suggests that the Ryugu particles were formed in the outer Solar System. Image: Modified from Ito et al. (2022).

Correlated analysis utilizing a scanning transmission X-ray microscopy (STXM, *3) and an ultra-high resolution transmission electron microscope (TEM, *4) revealed that aliphatic carbon-rich organics [*5] are present in a complex microstructure with coarse-grained phyllosilicates in a Ryugu particle [*6] (Figure 3). This is a “first-of-its-kind find” and provides direct evidence of water-mineral-organics interaction on an asteroid. Previous studies have shown that aliphatic carbon-rich organics decompose at temperatures above 30°C (86°F). Thus, the presence of organics containing aliphatic carbon suggests that asteroid Ryugu has not been heated above this temperature. Further studies are currently being conducted to clarify the structures and chemical compositions of the organic matter.


Image above: Figure 3. (Left) An ultra-thin section of 20-μm2 Ryugu particle analyzed by STXM. Organics have different functional groups. (Right) A TEM image of the area of the dashed lines in the left panel. Aliphatic carbon-rich organics are concentrated in the coarse-grained phyllosilicates. So far, this occurrence has only been seen in this Ryugu particle and serves as direct evidence of interactions between minerals and organics in an aqueous-rich environment. Image: Modified from Ito et al. (2022).

5. Future outlook

Coarse-grained phyllosilicates in the Ryugu particles are one potential source of organics and water to the inner Solar System, including the early Earth. The organics in the coarse-grained phyllosilicates are more resistant to decomposition than those in fine-grained phyllosilicates and may have been transported to Earth in their original state. The Ryugu particles, however, have heavier hydrogen isotopic compositions than those found on Earth, indicating that Ryugu-type asteroids may not be the only source of volatiles to the early Earth. In particles from the asteroid Itokawa, silicate minerals that shows a light hydrogen isotopic composition due to solar wind implantation have also been found (Daly et al., 2021). The water on Earth may have formed from mixed components with various hydrogen isotopic compositions. The following hypotheses could be formulated based on the results of the present study:

1.Asteroid Ryugu accreted some components that originated in the outer Solar System and contained abundant water and organics. The asteroid then traveled to the inner Solar System.

2.Organics associated with coarse-grained phyllosilicates may serve as one of the potential sources of water and organics to the Earth.

Further analyses of the Ryugu particles and of asteroid Bennu by the OSIRIS-REx Mission of the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) will allow us to test these hypotheses further.

Supplemental information

*1 Phase-2 curation (Kochi Team)
The ESCuC was established at the ISAS/JAXA primarily for the curation activities of return samples from extraterrestrial bodies after the “Hayabusa” missions. For the “Hayabusa2” mission, the Phase-2 curation team were organized by the ESCuC of JAXA and two institutes were authorized by the curation steering committee in 2017. One of the Phase-2 curation teams was proposed by Kochi Institute for Core Sample Research (KOCHI), JAMSTEC in collaboration with JASRI/SPring-8, UVSOR Synchrotron Facility/National Institutes of Natural Sciences, Institute for Molecular Science, and National Institute of Polar Research (NIPR). This team is working in collaboration with the ESCuC to develop sample distribution containers, transportation/transfer equipment, and analytical techniques for curation activities in an atmosphere-free environment. Another objective of the Kochi Team is to maximize the scientific results based on samples from the asteroid Ryugu by improving the description of the “Hayabusa2” samples using the advanced analytical techniques developed at each institution.

*2 Nanoscale secondary ion mass spectrometry (NanoSIMS)
This mass spectrometer allows visualization of the distribution of elements (e.g., carbon, nitrogen, hydrogen, and oxygen) or their isotopes in the sample with a primary ion beam of 50–100 nm. One nanometer (nm) is one-billionth of one meter.

*3 Scanning transmission X-ray microscopy (STXM)
This technique visualizes X-ray absorption spectra at a high resolution by scanning a thin film sample with an X-ray micro beam (30–150 nm) of varying wavelengths. In analyses of organic matter, soft X-ray synchrotron radiation is used to measure the X-ray absorption near the absorption edge of the constituent element (carbon in this study).

*4 Ultra-high resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
This electron microscope accelerates electrons at a high voltage, which are then irradiated on to a thin film sample. The transmitted and scattered electrons produce magnified images of the sample (from thousands to millions of times magnification). The X-ray analyzer attached to the electron microscope allows elemental analysis at submicron spatial resolution.

*5 Organics containing aliphatic carbon
Organics contain aliphatic carbon in the form of linear, branched, or non-aromatic rings with carbon atoms. Examples include methane, ethylene, paraffinic hydrocarbons, and acetylene.

*6 Hydrous silicate minerals
A silicate mineral contains structural water between sheet structures, as typified by serpentine and saponite.

6. Paper Information

Title: A pristine record of outer Solar System materials from asteroid Ryugu's returned sample

Authors:

Motoo Ito1*, Naotaka Tomioka1, Masayuki Uesugi2, Akira Yamaguchi3,4, Naoki Shirai5,¥, Takuji Ohigashi4,6,¥¥, Ming-Chang Liu7, Richard C. Greenwood8, Makoto Kimura3, Naoya Imae3,4, Kentaro Uesugi2, Aiko Nakato9, Kasumi Yogata9, Hayato Yuzawa6, Yu Kodama10,$, Akira Tsuchiyama11,12,13, Masahiro Yasutake2, Ross Findlay8, Ian A. Franchi8, James A. Malley8, Kaitlyn A. McCain7, Nozomi Matsuda7, Kevin D. McKeegan7, Kaori Hirahara14, Akihisa Takeuchi2, Shun Sekimoto15, Ikuya Sakurai16, Ikuo Okada16, Yuzuru Karouji17, Masahiko Arakawa18, Atsushi Fujii9, Masaki Fujimoto9, Masahiko Hayakawa9, Naoyuki Hirata18, Naru Hirata19, Rie Honda20,$$, Chikatoshi Honda19, Satoshi Hosoda9, Yu-ichi Iijima†, Hitoshi Ikeda9, Masateru Ishiguro21, Yoshiaki Ishihara17, Takahiro Iwata9, Kosuke Kawahara9, Shota Kikuchi22, Kohei Kitazato19, Koji Matsumoto23, Moe Matsuoka9, Tatsuhiro Michikami24, Yuya Mimasu9, Akira Miura9, Osamu Mori9, Tomokatsu Morota25, Satoru Nakazawa9, Noriyuki Namiki23, Hirotomo Noda23, Rina Noguchi26, Naoko Ogawa9, Kazunori Ogawa9, Tatsuaki Okada9, Chisato Okamoto†, Go Ono9, Masanobu Ozaki4,9, Takanao Saiki9, Naoya Sakatani27, Hirotaka Sawada9, Hiroki Senshu22, Yuri Shimaki9, Kei Shirai9, Seiji Sugita25, Yuto Takei9, Hiroshi Takeuchi9, Satoshi Tanaka9, Eri Tatsumi28, Fuyuto Terui29, Ryudo Tsukizaki9, Koji Wada22, Manabu Yamada22, Tetsuya Yamada9, Yukio Yamamoto9, Hajime Yano9, Yasuhiro Yokota9, Keisuke Yoshihara9, Makoto Yoshikawa9, Kent Yoshikawa9, Ryota Fukai9, Shizuho Furuya9,25, Kentaro Hatakeda10, Tasuku Hayashi9, Yuya Hitomi10, Kazuya Kumagai10, Akiko Miyazaki9, Masahiro Nishimura9, Hiromichi Soejima10, Ayako Iwamae10,$$$, Daiki Yamamoto9,30, Miwa Yoshitake9,$$$$, Toru Yada9, Masanao Abe9, Tomohiro Usui9, Sei-ichiro Watanabe31, and Yuichi Tsuda4,9.

Affiliation:

[1] Kochi Institute for Core Sample Research, X-Star, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science Technology (JAMSTEC), Nankoku, Kochi 783-8502, Japan
[2] Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute (JASRI/SPring-8), 1-1-1 Kouto, Sayo, Hyogo 679-5198, Japan
[3] National Institute of Polar Research (NIPR), Tachikawa 190-8518, Tokyo, Japan
[4] The Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI), Hayama 240-0193, Japan
[5] Graduate School of Science, Department of Chemistry, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Hachioji 190-0397, Tokyo, Japan
[6] UVSOR Synchrotron Facility, Institute for Molecular Science, 38 Nishigo-naka, Myodaiji, Okazaki, Aichi 444-8585, Japan
[7] Department of Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences, UCLA 595 Charles Young Drive E., Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
[8] The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK
[9] Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (ISAS), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-5210, Japan
[10] Marine Works Japan, Ltd., Yokosuka 237-0063, Japan
[11] Research Organization of Science and Technology, Ritsumeikan University, Shiga 525-8577, Japan
[12] CAS Key Laboratory of Mineralogy and Metallogeny/Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Mineral Physics and Materials, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Guangzhou 510640, People’s republic of China
[13] CAS Center for Excellence in Deep Earth Science, Guangzhou 510640, People’s republic of China
[14] Department of Mechanical Engineering, Osaka University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
[15] Institute for Integrated Radiation and Nuclear Science, Kyoto University Kumatori-cho, Sennan-gun, Osaka 590-0494, Japan
[16] Synchrotron Radiation Research Center, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8603, Japan
[17] JAXA Space Exploration Center, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-5210, Japan
[18] Kobe University, Kobe 657-8501, Japan
[19] University of Aizu, Aizu-Wakamatsu 965-8580, Japan
[20] Kochi University, Kochi 780-8520, Japan
[21] Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
[22] Chiba Institute of Technology, Narashino 275-0016, Japan
[23] National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Mitaka 181-8588, Japan
[24] Kindai University, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-2116, Japan
[25] The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
[26] Niigata University, Niigata 950-2181, Japan
[27] Rikkyo University, Tokyo 171-8501, Japan
[28] Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, University of La Laguna; Tenerife, Spain
[29] Kanagawa Institute of Technology, Atsugi 243-0292, Japan
[30] Earth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan
[31] Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8601, Japan
¥ Current affiliation: Kanagawa University, 2946 Tsuchiya, Hiratsuka, Kanagawa 259-1293, Japan
¥¥ Current affiliation: Photon Factory, Institute of Materials Structure Science, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801 Japan
$ Current affiliation: Toyo Corporation
$$ Current affiliation: Center for Data Science, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Ehime 790-8577, Japan
$$$ Current address: Toyo University, Bunkyo, Tokyo 112-8606, Japan.
$$$$$ Current address: Japan Patent Office, Chiyoda, Tokyo 100-8915, Japan
†Deceased.
*Correspondence to Motoo Ito, motoo@jamstec.go.jp

Related Link

HAYABUSA2 PROJECT: https://www.hayabusa2.jaxa.jp/en/

Asteroid Explorer Hayabusa2: https://www.isas.jaxa.jp/en/missions/spacecraft/current/hayabusa2.html

Asteroid Explorer "Hayabusa2": https://global.jaxa.jp/projects/sas/hayabusa2/

Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology: https://www.jamstec.go.jp/e/

Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute: http://www.jasri.jp/en/

National Institute of Polar Research: https://www.nipr.ac.jp/english/

Institute for Molecular Science: https://www.ims.ac.jp/en/

KANAGAWA UNIVERSITY: https://www.kanagawa-u.ac.jp/

The Open University: https://www.open.ac.uk/

Osaka University: https://www.osaka-u.ac.jp/en

Ritsumeikan University: http://en.ritsumei.ac.jp/

Nagoya University: https://en.nagoya-u.ac.jp/

Journal:Nature Astronomy, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-022-01745-5

Images (mentioned), Animation (mentioned), Text, Credits: Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA)/Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC)/Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute (JASRI)/National Institute of Polar Research/Institute for Molecular Science/KANAGAWA UNIVERSITY/The Open University/Osaka University/Ritsumeikan University/Nagoya University.

Greetings, Orbiter.ch