jeudi 15 décembre 2016

The bankruptcy of S3 is pronounced











S3 - Swiss Space Systems logo.

Dec.15, 2016

Swiss Space Systems Holdings (S3), based in Payerne (VD) Switzerland, is bankrupt.

The adjournment was revoked by the Civil Court of the Waldensian Broye and North, said Thursday the Judicial Order of Vaud. The court ruled on Wednesday following the 6 December hearing. He revoked the adjournment and declared bankruptcy without prior prosecution of the company.

The court considered that "the conditions for prolonging the adjournment were no longer fulfilled". Swiss Space Systems Holding may lodge an appeal against the decision of the court within ten days.

Pascal Jaussi, CEO / Founder of Swiss Space Syrems (S3)

For weeks, the company of Pascal Jaussi is at the center of the attention because of its financial difficulties. S3 wants to launch mini-satellites from a shuttle from an airplane. The company also announced plans to organize weightless flights.

On the activity of his company, Pascal Jaussi said that "S3 does not make military equipment". He nevertheless points to the strategic importance of space and its control in the "world economic war". "We were threatened, tapped. Our servers have even been sabotaged. "

Dassault retires

Launched in 2013 and based in Payerne (VD), S3 has benefited from the support of Dassault Aviation, "a great industrialist who protects you from blows". When the French group withdrew in 2015, "we found ourselves vulnerable", which required the search for investors.

Pascal Jaussi says that the minor flights (Zero G) are scheduled for the end of January. "We will be on time for these flights. I do not doubt for a moment, because I have behind me a formidable team. Since the flights have been canceled.

Swiss Space Systems concept

At the end of August, Pascal Jaussi claimed to have been very violently assaulted in the woods of Aumont (FR). The investigation is still ongoing.

In spite of everything, this enterprise will be able to reborn from these ashes like the Phoenix! It still enjoys support in Switzerland. Courage Pascal!

For more information about Swiss Space Systems (S3), visit: http://www.s-3.ch/

Images, Text, Credits: ATS/S3/Orbiter.ch Aerospace/Roland Berga.

Best regards, Orbiter.ch

Newly Launched CYGNSS Microsatellites to Shed Light on Hurricane Intensity











CYGNSS Mission logo.

Dec. 15, 2016


Animation above: Launch of the Orbital ATK Pegasus XL rocket carrying NASA’s CYGNSS spacecraft. Animation Credit: NASA TV.

Hurricane forecasters will soon have a new tool to better understand and forecast storm intensity. A constellation of eight microsatellites, called NASA’s Cyclone Global Navigation Satellite System mission, or CYGNSS, got a boost into Earth orbit at 8:37 a.m. EST today, Dec. 15, aboard an Orbital ATK Pegasus XL rocket.

Pegasus XL Rocket Launches with CYGNSS Spacecraft

The Orbital ATK Pegasus XL rocket launched from the company's L-1011 Stargazer airplane at 8:37 a.m. EST, carrying the CYGNSS spacecraft for launch.

The unique, air-launched vehicle was carried aloft by Orbital’s modified L-1011 aircraft, “Stargazer,” which took off from the Skid Strip runway at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida and deployed the three-stage Pegasus XL rocket at a predetermined drop point 39,000 feet above the Atlantic Ocean and about 110 nautical miles east-northeast of Daytona Beach.

Orbital’s modified L-1011 aircraft, “Stargazer.” Image Credits: NASA/Laurie Losey

“The deployments looked great — right on time,” said John Scherrer, CYGNSS Project Manager at the Southwest Research Institute and today’s CYGNSS mission manager.

“We think everything looks really, really good. About three hours after launch we’ll attempt first contact, and after that, we’ll go through a series of four contacts where we hit two [observatories] each time, checking the health and status of each spacecraft,” Scherrer added.

Prelaunch activities went smoothly throughout the morning, aided by good weather and healthy vehicles, according to NASA Launch Manager Tim Dunn of the agency’s Launch Services Program.


Image above: View of NASA's CYGNSS Hurricane Mission Launch From Chase Plane. Image Credits: NASA/Lori Losey.

A NASA F-18 chase plane from Armstrong Flight Research Center in California provided visual contact and video of the conjoined Stargazer aircraft and Pegasus XL rocket.

The chase plane took to the skies minutes before the Stargazer went airborne at 7:38 a.m.

“It’s a beautiful day, with gorgeous weather,” Dunn said. “We had a nominal flyout, and all three stages performed beautifully. We had no issues at all with launch vehicle performance.”

Only 13 minutes after launch, the first pair of CYGNSS microsatellites deployed, with the rest releasing in pairs every 30 seconds.

“It’s a great event when you have a successful spacecraft separation – and with eight microsatellites, you get to multiply that times eight,” Dunn said.

CYGNSS Overview

“When the first two [observatories] came off, I started feeling good,” said CYGNSS Principal Investigator Chris Ruf of the University of Michigan. “When the last two came off, it felt fantastic. The orbit is right on the money of what we’ve been modeling.”

The team expects to begin getting science data next week, Ruf said. There will be a one- to two-month commissioning phase in which each microsatellite will be checked out and maneuvered into its final position.

The CYGNSS constellation is expected to be operational in time for the 2017 hurricane season. “Thanks, Pegasus and NASA, for a smooth ride,” Scherrer said.

CYGNSS (Cyclone Global Navigation Satellite System): https://www.nasa.gov/cygnss

Images (mentioned), Videos, Text, Credits: NASA/Sarah Loff/Anna Heiney.

Greetings, Orbiter.ch

Galileo Begins Serving the Globe












ESA - GALILEO Programme logo.

15 December 2016

Europe’s own Galileo satellite navigation system has begun operating, with the satellites in space delivering positioning, navigation and timing information to users around the globe.

Today, the European Commission, owner of the system, formally announced the start of Galileo Initial Services, the first step towards full operational capability.

Galileo coverage

Further launches will continue to build the satellite constellation, which will gradually improve the system performance and availability worldwide.

ESA has overseen the design and deployment of Galileo on behalf of the Commission, with system operations and service provision due to be entrusted to the European Global Navigation Satellite System Agency next year.

After five years of launches there are now 18 satellites in orbit. The most recent four, launched last month, are undergoing testing ahead of joining the constellation next spring.

Galileo satellites 15–18 prepared for liftoff

The full Galileo constellation will consist of 24 satellites plus orbital spares, intended to prevent any interruption in service.

ESA Director general Jan Woerner noted, “For ESA, this is a very important moment in the programme. We know that the performance of the system is excellent. 

“The announcement of Initial Services is the recognition that the effort, time and money invested by ESA and the Commission has succeeded, that the work of our engineers and other staff has paid off, that European industry can be proud of having delivered this fantastic system.”

Galileo satellite

Paul Verhoef, ESA’s Director of the Galileo Programme and Navigation-related Activities, added, “Today’s announcement marks the transition from a test system to one that is operational. We are proud to be a partner in the Galileo programme.

“Still, much work remains to be done. The entire constellation needs to be deployed, the ground infrastructure needs to be completed and the overall system needs to be tested and verified.

“In addition, together with the Commission we have started work on the second generation, and this is likely to be a long but rewarding adventure.”

Initial Services

Galileo is now providing three service types, the availability of which will continue to be improved.

The Open Service is a free mass-market service for users with enabled chipsets in, for instance, smartphones and car navigation systems. Fully interoperable with GPS, combined coverage will deliver more accurate and reliable positioning for users.

Cospas–Sarsat system

Galileo’s Public Regulated Service is an encrypted, robust service for government-authorised users such as civil protection, fire brigades and the police.

The Search and Rescue Service is Europe’s contribution to the long-running Cospas–Sarsat international emergency beacon location. The time between someone locating a distress beacon when lost at sea or in the wilderness will be reduced from up to three hours to just 10 minutes, with its location determined to within 5 km, rather than the previous 10 km. 

Finding your way

Like all satnav systems, Galileo operations rely on the extremely precise measurement of time – around 10 billionths of a second on average.

Because all electromagnetic waves, including radio, travel at a fixed speed – just under 30 cm each billionth of a second – the time it takes for Galileo signals to reach a user receiver yields distance measurements. All the receiver has to do is multiply the travel time by the speed of light.

Galileo constellation

A minimum of four satellites must be visible to pinpoint position: one each to fix latitude, longitude and altitude, with another to ensure synchronised timings. More satellites provide a greater level of service coverage and precision.

The public will begin benefiting as Galileo-capable devices enter the marketplace: 17 companies, representing more than 95% of global supply, now produce Galileo-ready chips.

Galileo System Time

‘Galileo System Time’ is set to become an important utility in its own right, essential for synchronising worldwide banking, power and data networks.

Related links:

Launching Galileo website: http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Navigation/The_future_-_Galileo/Launching_Galileo

Galileo Tour: http://esamultimedia.esa.int/multimedia/Galileo_tour/galileo.swf?lang=gb&mylang=gb

EC Galileo website: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/space/galileo/index_en.htm

European GNSS Agency: http://www.gsa.europa.eu/

Use Galileo: http://www.usegalileo.eu/EN/

Galileo and EGNOS: http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Navigation/Galileo_and_EGNOS

About satellite navigation: http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Navigation/About_satellite_navigation2

Images, Text, Credits: ESA/P. Carril/OHB/Cospas-Sarsat/Videos: Directed by Stephane Corvaja, ESA and Manuel Pedoussaut, Zetapress; Music by Hubrid-Jupiter.

Best regards, Orbiter.ch

mercredi 14 décembre 2016

Revolutions in Understanding the Ionosphere, Earth’s Interface to Space






NASA - Ionospheric Connection Explorer (ICON) logo.

Dec. 14, 2016

Scientists from NASA and three universities have presented new discoveries about the way heat and energy move and manifest in the ionosphere, a region of Earth’s atmosphere that reacts to changes from both space above and Earth below.

Far above Earth’s surface, within the tenuous upper atmosphere, is a sea of particles that have been split into positive and negative ions by the sun’s harsh ultraviolet radiation. Called the ionosphere, this is Earth's interface to space, the area where Earth's neutral atmosphere and terrestrial weather give way to the space environment that dominates most of the rest of the universe – an environment that hosts charged particles and a complex system of electric and magnetic fields. The ionosphere is both shaped by waves from the atmosphere below and uniquely responsive to the changing conditions in space, conveying such space weather into observable, Earth-effective phenomena – creating the aurora, disrupting communications signals, and sometimes causing satellite problems.


Image above: The ionosphere is a layer of charged particles in Earth’s atmosphere that extends from about 50 to 360 miles above the surface of Earth. Processes in the ionosphere also create bright swaths of color in the sky, known as airglow. Image Credit: NASA.

Many of these effects are not well-understood, leaving the ionosphere, for the most part, a region of mystery. Scientists from NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, the Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C., the University of Colorado Boulder, and the University of California, Berkeley, presented new results on the ionosphere at the fall meeting of the American Geophysical Union on Dec. 14, 2016, in San Francisco.

One researcher explained how the interaction between the ionosphere and another layer in the atmosphere, the thermosphere, counteract heating in the thermosphere – heating that leads to expansion of the upper atmosphere, which can cause premature orbital decay. Another researcher described how energy outside the ionosphere accumulates until it discharges – not unlike lightning – offering an explanation for how energy from space weather crosses over into the ionosphere. A third scientist discussed two upcoming NASA missions that will provide key observations of this region, helping us better understand how the ionosphere reacts both to space weather and to terrestrial weather.

Changes in the ionosphere are primarily driven by the sun’s activity. Though it may appear unchanging to us on the ground, our sun is, in fact, a very dynamic, active star. Watching the sun in ultraviolet wavelengths of light from space – above our UV light-blocking atmosphere – reveals constant activity, including bursts of light, particles, and magnetic fields.

Occasionally, the sun releases huge clouds of particles and magnetic fields that explode out from the sun at more than a million miles per hour. These are called coronal mass ejections, or CMEs. When a CME reaches Earth, its embedded magnetic fields can interact with Earth’s natural magnetic field – called the magnetosphere – sometimes compressing it or even causing parts of it to realign.

It is this realignment that transfers energy into Earth’s atmospheric system, by setting off a chain reaction of shifting electric and magnetic fields that can send the particles already trapped near Earth skittering in all directions. These particles can then create one of the most recognizable and awe-inspiring space weather events – the aurora, otherwise known as the Northern Lights.

But the transfer of energy into the atmosphere isn’t always so innocuous. It can also heat the upper atmosphere – where low-Earth satellites orbit – causing it to expand like a hot-air balloon.

“This swelling means there’s more stuff at higher altitudes than we would otherwise expect,” said Delores Knipp, a space scientist at the University of Colorado Boulder. “That extra stuff can drag on satellites, disrupting their orbits and making them harder to track.”


Image above: The swelling of Earth’s upper atmosphere during geomagnetic storms can alter the orbits of satellites, bringing them lower and lower. Image Credit: NASA.

This phenomenon is called satellite drag. New research shows that this understanding of the upper atmosphere’s response to solar storms – and the resulting satellite drag – may not always hold true. 

“Our basic understanding has been that geomagnetic storms put energy into the Earth system, which leads to swelling of the thermosphere, which can pull satellites down into lower orbits,” said Knipp, lead researcher on these new results. “But that isn’t always the case.”

Sometimes, the energy from solar storms can trigger a chemical reaction that produces a compound called nitric oxide in the upper atmosphere. Nitric oxide acts as a cooling agent at very high altitudes, promoting energy loss to space, so a significant increase in this compound can cause a phenomenon called overcooling.

“Overcooling causes the atmosphere to quickly shed energy from the geomagnetic storm much quicker than anticipated,” said Knipp. “It’s like the thermostat for the upper atmosphere got stuck on the ‘cool’ setting.”

That quick loss of energy counteracts the previous expansion, causing the upper atmosphere to collapse back down – sometimes to an even smaller state than it started in, leaving satellites traveling through lower-density regions than anticipated.

A new analysis by Knipp and her team classifies the types of storms that are likely to lead to this overcooling and rapid upper atmosphere collapse. By comparing over a decade of measurements from Department of Defense satellites and NASA’s Thermosphere, Ionosphere, Mesosphere Energetics and Dynamics, or TIMED, mission, the researchers were able to spot patterns in energy moving throughout the upper atmosphere.

“Overcooling is most likely to happen when very fast and magnetically-organized ejecta from the sun rattle Earth’s magnetic field,” said Knipp. “Slow clouds or poorly-organized clouds just don’t have the same effect.”

This means that, counterintuitively, the most energetic solar storms are likely to provide a net cooling and shrinking effect on the upper atmosphere, rather than heating and expanding it as had been previously understood.

Competing with this cooling process is the heating caused by solar storm energy making its way into Earth’s atmosphere. Though scientists have known that solar wind energy eventually reaches the ionosphere, they have understood little about where, when and how this transfer takes place. New observations show that the process is localized and impulsive, and partly dependent on the state of the ionosphere itself.


Image above:: Earth's limb at night, seen from the International Space Station, with air glow visual composited into the image. Image Credit: NASA.

Traditionally, scientists have thought that the way energy moves throughout Earth’s magnetosphere and atmosphere is determined by the characteristics of the incoming particles and magnetic fields of the solar wind – for instance, a long, steady stream of solar particles would produce different effects than a faster, less consistent stream. However, new data shows that the way energy moves is much more closely tied to the mechanisms by which the magnetosphere and ionosphere are linked.

“The energy transfer process turns out to be very similar to the way lightning forms during a thunderstorm,” said Bob Robinson, a space scientist at NASA Goddard and the Catholic University of America.

During a thunderstorm, a buildup of electric potential difference – called voltage – between a cloud and the ground leads to a sudden, violent discharge of that electric energy in the form of lightning. This discharge can only happen if there’s an electrically conducting pathway between the cloud and the ground, called a leader.

Similarly, the solar wind striking the magnetosphere can build up a voltage difference between different regions of the ionosphere and the magnetosphere. Electric currents can form between these regions, creating the conducting pathway needed for that built-up electric energy to discharge into the ionosphere as a kind of lightning.

“Terrestrial lightning takes several milliseconds to occur, while this magnetosphere-ionosphere ‘lightning’ lasts for several hours – and the amount of energy transferred is hundreds to thousands of times greater,” said Robinson, lead researcher on these new results. These results are based on data from the global Iridium satellite communications constellation. 

Because solar storms enhance the electric currents that let this magnetosphere-ionosphere lightning take place, this type of energy transfer is much more likely when Earth’s magnetic field is jostled by a solar event.

The huge energy transfer from this magnetosphere-ionosphere lightning is associated with heating of the ionosphere and upper atmosphere, as well as increased aurora.

Looking Forward

Though scientists are making progress in understanding the key processes that drive changes in the ionosphere and, in turn, on Earth, there is still much to be understood. In 2017, NASA is launching two missions to investigate this dynamic region: the Ionospheric Connection Explorer, or ICON, and Global Observations of the Limb and Disk, or GOLD.

“The ionosphere doesn’t only react to energy input by solar storms,” said Scott England, a space scientist at the University of California, Berkeley, who works on both the ICON and GOLD missions. “Terrestrial weather, like hurricanes and wind patterns, can shape the atmosphere and ionosphere, changing how they react to space weather.”

ICON will simultaneously measure the characteristics of charged particles in the ionosphere and neutral particles in the atmosphere – including those shaped by terrestrial weather – to understand how they interact. GOLD will take many of the same measurements, but from geostationary orbit, which gives a global view of how the ionosphere changes.


Animation above: NASA’s Ionospheric Connection Explorer, or ICON, and NASA’s Global-scale Observations of the Limb and Disk, or GOLD, mission will take complementary observations of Earth’s ionosphere and upper atmosphere. Animation Credit: NASA.

Observations of the Limb and Disk, or GOLD, mission will take complementary observations of Earth’s ionosphere and upper atmosphere. Credit: NASA

Both ICON and GOLD will take advantage of a phenomenon called airglow – the light emitted by gas that is excited or ionized by solar radiation – to study the ionosphere. By measuring the light from airglow, scientists can track the changing composition, density, and even temperature of particles in the ionosphere and neutral atmosphere.

ICON’s position 350 miles above Earth will enable it to study the atmosphere in profile, giving scientists an unprecedented look at the state of the ionosphere at a range of altitudes. Meanwhile, GOLD’s position 22,000 miles above Earth will give it the chance to track changes in the ionosphere as they move across the globe, similar to how a weather satellite tracks a storm.

“We will be using these two missions together to understand how dynamic weather systems are reflected in the upper atmosphere, and how these changes impact the ionosphere,” said England. 

ICON and GOLD are Explorer-class missions. NASA Goddard manages the Explorer Program for NASA's Science Mission Directorate in Washington. UC Berkeley's Space Sciences Laboratory will develop the ICON mission and the two ultraviolet imaging spectrographs, the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, D.C., will develop the MIGHTI instrument, the University of Texas in Dallas will develop the Ion Velocity Meter, and the ICON spacecraft is being built by Orbital ATK in Dulles, Virginia. GOLD is led by the University of Central Florida, and the Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics at the University of Colorado Boulder is building the instrument.

NASA Goddard manages the TIMED mission for the Heliophysics Division within the Science Mission Directorate at NASA Headquarters in Washington. The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory in Laurel, Maryland, built the spacecraft for NASA.

Related Links:

ICON (Ionospheric Connection Explorer): http://www.nasa.gov/icon

MIGHTI instrument: https://www.nasa.gov/content/icon-spacecraft-and-instruments

NASA’s AGU website: http://www.nasa.gov/agu

Download related multimedia from NASA Goddard's Scientific Visualization Studio: http://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/12457

Images (mentioned), Animation (mentioned), Text, Credits: NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, by Sarah Frazier/Rob Garner.

Greetings, Orbiter.ch

AWAKE: Making waves in accelerator technology












CERN - European Organization for Nuclear Research logo.

14 Dec 2016


Image above: A member of the AWAKE collaboration, from the Max Planck Institute, performing tests in the experiment's underground tunnel (Image: Maximilien Brice/CERN).

The AWAKE collaboration has reached a major milestone; in the final week of CERN's accelerator operations for 2016, it has observed strong modulation of high-energy proton bunches in plasma, signaling the generation of very strong electromagnetic fields. This is a significant step towards the goal of using the proton-driven plasma wakefield technique to accelerate electrons.

The facility was successfully commissioned between June and November and the experiment took its first data in the final week of accelerator operations at CERN in 2016.

The Advanced Proton Driven Plasma Wakefield Acceleration Experiment (AWAKE) is the first facility investigating the use of plasma wakefields driven by proton beams to accelerate charged particles.

"The use of proton bunches to drive wakefields is of particular interest because of the large energy carried by the proton bunches from the CERN SPS and LHC accelerators," says the AWAKE spokesperson, Allen Caldwell, from the Max Planck Institute of Physics in Munich. "It allows for much longer acceleration stages than for other techniques," he points out.

The AWAKE experiment injects a "drive" bunch of protons from CERN’s SPS accelerator into a plasma column created by ionising a gas with a laser. When this bunch interacts with the plasma, it splits into a series of smaller bunches, in a process called self-modulation. As these shorter bunches move through the plasma, they generate a strong wakefield. It is the process of self-modulation that the AWAKE team has observed signals of, and from which it can infer the creation of the wakefield.


Graphic above: Image showing the simulation of the interaction between the bunches of protons (red dots) and the plasma wakefield (blue waves). (Image: Alexey Petrenko/CERN).

The next step, which AWAKE has yet to demonstrate, is to inject a second beam of electrons, the “witness” beam, in the right phase behind the proton beam. This witness beam "feels" the wakefield and is accelerated, just as a surfer accelerates by riding a wave.

The use of plasma to accelerate particles is a potential alternative to traditional accelerating methods that rely on radiofrequency electromagnetic cavities. It has long been known that plasmas are capable of supporting very strong electric fields. The challenge for researchers is to understand the best way to take advantage of this capability in order to create future compact and powerful particle accelerators at reasonable costs. The fields generated by plasma wakefields driven by proton beams could be up to two orders of magnitude higher than fields achievable using conventional radio-frequency cavities.

“To have observed indications for the first time of proton bunch self-modulation, after just a few days of tests is an excellent achievement. It's down to a very motivated and dedicated team," grins Edda Gschwendtner, AWAKE technical coordinator and CERN AWAKE project leader.

"We now plan to study this process in detail in 2017. We hope then to demonstrate the acceleration of electrons in the wake of the proton bunch,” adds Patric Muggli, AWAKE physics coordinator from CERN and the Max Planck Institute for Physics in Munich.

This exciting development, the culmination of three years of intense preparation, opens a new era of particle accelerator development at CERN and worldwide.

Note:

CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research, is one of the world’s largest and most respected centres for scientific research. Its business is fundamental physics, finding out what the Universe is made of and how it works. At CERN, the world’s largest and most complex scientific instruments are used to study the basic constituents of matter — the fundamental particles. By studying what happens when these particles collide, physicists learn about the laws of Nature.

The instruments used at CERN are particle accelerators and detectors. Accelerators boost beams of particles to high energies before they are made to collide with each other or with stationary targets. Detectors observe and record the results of these collisions.

Founded in 1954, the CERN Laboratory sits astride the Franco–Swiss border near Geneva. It was one of Europe’s first joint ventures and now has 22 Member States.

Related links:

Advanced Proton Driven Plasma Wakefield Acceleration Experiment (AWAKE): https://home.web.cern.ch/about/experiments/awake

SPS accelerator: http://home.cern/about/accelerators/super-proton-synchrotron

LHC accelerator: http://home.cern/about/accelerators/large-hadron-collider

For more information about European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Visit: http://home.cern/

Image (mentioned), Graphic (mentioned), Text, Credits: CERN/Stephanie Hills/Corinne Pralavorio.

Best regards, Orbiter.ch

How on Earth Does NASA Choose a Landing Site on Mars?












NASA patch.

Dec. 14, 2016


Image above: A small basin (center foreground) lies below the southern rim of Melas Chasma, part of Valles Marineris. This is one of the eight potential landing sites being studied for the Mars 2020 rover. Image Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech/Arizona State University, R. Luk.

Getting to the surface of Mars takes years of planning, engineering and science work, a successful launch, and a months-long journey of millions of miles.  You only get one opportunity to touch down at a site on Mars, so it’s critical to get it right.  

“You can’t say, ‘here are ten different sites, let’s go to them,’” said Michael Meyer, the lead scientist for the Mars Exploration Program at NASA Headquarters in Washington. “Each mission—it’s one shot. You definitely want to pick the right one.”

The Community is Crucial

Meyer spoke about how NASA picks Mars landing sites on Sunday, during the annual meeting of the American Geophysical Union (AGU) in San Francisco. He said the “spectacular” involvement of the broader science community is critical in choosing sites for both robotic and human landings. Continuing the open process started with Spirit and Opportunity, NASA is holding landing site workshops for both the next rover, Mars 2020, and a future human landing site mission. (Find out how to get involved or attend a workshop: Mars 2020 Landing Sites | Human Landing Sites ) 

Meyer was joined at the AGU lecture by Alex Longo, a high school student who has proposed both human and robotic landing sites, and Bethany Ehlmann, a scientist from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory who works on both the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter and Curiosity, and will be part of the Mars 2020 team.

Meyer gave the AGU audience an update on landing site selection for Mars 2020. Two workshops have already narrowed suggested sites down from 54 to 21, and then from 21 to eight high priority sites. A third workshop is set for February 8-10 in Monrovia, California. Now, Meyer said, the scientific community can do more “homework,” using orbital assets such as the high-resolution camera on the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter to get more information about the site.

The community starts its search by focusing on the mission objectives and what areas might support that kind of science. For Mars 2020, scientists are looking for a place that has evidence of water – possibly an ancient shoreline -- and a strong potential to be a place where life could’ve thrived. Mars 2020 is also set to cache samples for return to Earth later.  That adds more interesting possibilities for landing sites, since there could be science targets the rover isn’t set up to study on Mars that still have value when returned to Earth.

The last Mars 2020 workshop had 150 attendees and another 50 online, exchanging ideas and raising fresh questions. “It’s a sincere scientific discussion about what we know about Mars, about what we think we know but have to admit that we really don’t know, or things we have misconceptions about,” said Meyer.

Decisions for Decades to Come


Image above: Artist's concept of astronauts at work in a Martian exploration zone. Image Credit: NASA.

NASA’s Journey to Mars calls for sending humans to orbit the Red Planet in the 2030s, with trips to the surface to follow. But NASA isn’t waiting to scout potential sites. We're using the orbiters at Mars today to help refine our sense of what makes an optimal landing site, and to eventually narrow the list of candidate sites.

The first human landing sites workshop in 2015 yielded 47 landing site proposals. NASA is looking to set up a semi-permanent base, dubbed an “exploration zone,” where crews can live off the land and explore up to a 60-mile (100-kilometer) radius.  There will be more workshops and more reconnaissance as the list narrows down in years to come.

With humans, said Meyer, NASA is looking for a place where astronauts can make the best of the surroundings, and trying to answer some key questions. As he puts it, “Is there a place to land? Are there resources that you can make use of there, such as water so that you can make your own fuel? Are there interesting things in the area for the astronauts to explore?”  

More than 400 people supported the first human landing sties workshop in 2015, with a diverse group of disciplines represented—all of which are critical for picking an ideal site for the first human base on Mars.

Selecting the Site — for 2020 or Human Exploration

Even after the process narrows it down to a small group of sites, it can be painful to pick only one. And despite all the advance work, there are always new things to learn from going there.

“You feel like you know the place already, and then when you get there,” said Meyer, “it’s different. It’s always a great surprise.”

Related links:

Mars 2020 Landing Sites: http://marsnext.jpl.nasa.gov/

Human Landing Sites: https://www.nasa.gov/journeytomars/mars-exploration-zones

Eight high priority sites: http://mars.nasa.gov/mars2020/mission/timeline/prelaunch/landing-site-selection/

Exploration zone: https://www.nasa.gov/feature/where-on-mars-might-humans-first-land

NASA’s Journey to Mars: https://www.nasa.gov/topics/journeytomars/index.html

Images (mentioned), Text, Credits: NASA/Jim Wilson.

Greetings, Orbiter.ch

ATLAS releases first measurement of W mass using LHC data












CERN - European Organization for Nuclear Research logo.

14 Dec 2016


Image above: ATLAS is one of the four major experiments at the LHC. It is a general-purpose particle physics experiment run by an international collaboration (Image: Claudia Marcelloni/ CERN).

The ATLAS collaboration today reports the first measurement of the W boson mass using Large Hadron Collider (LHC) proton–proton collision data at a centre-of-mass energy of 7 TeV.


Graphic above: The ATLAS measurement of the W boson mass (in red) is compared to the Standard Model prediction (in purple), and to the combined values measured at the LEP and Tevatron collider (in blue) (Image: ATLAS Collaboration/CERN).

The W boson was discovered in 1983 at the CERN SPS collider and led to a Nobel prize in physics in 1984. Although the properties of the W boson have been studied for more than 30 years, measuring its mass remains a major challenge. A precise measurement of the W boson mass is vital, as a deviation from the Standard Model’s predictions could hint at new physics.

The latest results from ATLAS show a measured value of 80370±19 MeV, which is consistent with the Standard Model prediction. It is also consistent with the combined values measured at the LEP and Tevatron colliders, and with the world average (see graph above).

Measuring the W mass is particularly challenging at the LHC, compared to previous colliders, due to the large number of interactions per beam crossing. Despite this, the ATLAS result matches the best single-experiment measurement of the W mass (performed by the CDF collaboration https://www-cdf.fnal.gov/collaboration/).

Read more on the ATLAS experiment’s website: http://cern.ch/go/p6sN

Note:

CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research, is one of the world’s largest and most respected centres for scientific research. Its business is fundamental physics, finding out what the Universe is made of and how it works. At CERN, the world’s largest and most complex scientific instruments are used to study the basic constituents of matter — the fundamental particles. By studying what happens when these particles collide, physicists learn about the laws of Nature.

The instruments used at CERN are particle accelerators and detectors. Accelerators boost beams of particles to high energies before they are made to collide with each other or with stationary targets. Detectors observe and record the results of these collisions.

Founded in 1954, the CERN Laboratory sits astride the Franco–Swiss border near Geneva. It was one of Europe’s first joint ventures and now has 22 Member States.

Related links:

Large Hadron Collider (LHC): http://home.web.cern.ch/topics/large-hadron-collider

SPS collider: http://home.cern/about/accelerators/super-proton-synchrotron

LEP collider: http://about/accelerators/large-electron-positron-collider

Tevatron collider: https://www.fnal.gov/pub/tevatron/tevatron-accelerator.html

W boson: http://home.cern/tags/w-boson

Standard Model: http://home.cern/about/physics/standard-model

For more information about European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Visit: http://home.cern/

Image (mentioned), Graphic (mentioned), Text, Credits: CERN/Harriet Kim Jarlett.

Best regards, Orbiter.ch